BUDGET SPEECH 2002
PROGRAMME BASED BUDGETING FOR EFFICIENT RESOURCE ALLOCATION
AND USE WITH A POVERTY REDUCTION DIMENSION
V. OUTTURN OF THE 2001 BUDGET
Mr Speaker,
- Budgetary allocation to the sectors for several years now, has been
skewed towards the social sector and the 2001 budget is no exception.
This is because our focus remains on poverty reduction. In 2001, we
committed D173.2m to educational expansion and development, D110.4m
to health and social welfare services delivery and D6.8m to youth and
sport development. In effect the social sector is allotted 36.5% of
to total government spending excluding debt service charges, which in
itself constitutes 34.4% of total allocated expenditure for the year.
In addition, we have earmarked D68.1m of HIPC relief funds for these
sectors.
- With these, and the intervention of our development partners we have
been able to increase the number of Upper Basic Schools (UBS) by nineteen
representing an increment of 22% from the previous year. This has increased
the number of places in UBS thereby increasing the transition rate to
91% in regions 1 & 2 and 100% in the other regions where basic cycles
were introduced. The Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) improved by 1.6% though
it fell short of the target by 25%. Girls’ enrolment increased by 3.8%
but again fell below the target by 3.4%. The Pupil Teacher Ratio at
36, is still within the target of 45 implying there is still room for
better cost management, while Pupil Classroom Ratio slightly over stretch
the target at 57 resulting from rising GER and the construction of new
classrooms.
- Access to health facilities is slowly improving with approximately
90 per cent of the population living within 7.5 km of a health facility;
success has also been recorded with the Baby Friendly Community Initiative
(BFCI) in achieving its prime objective of increasing the numbers of
mothers who exclusively fed their babies in the targeted villages
- Government has not lost sight of the fact that a prospering social
sector has to be supported by a vibrant productive sector for sustainability.
To this end we allocated 6.2% of total ‘disposable’ income to the productive
sector and as a result, the contribution of agriculture to GDP increased
by 8.6%, manufacturing by 1.7% and trade by 0.5%.
- In 2001, an amount of D65.7 million was allocated as HIPC funds with
65% going to the social sector. The purpose of the HIPC allocation is
to accelerate social sector spending in our fight against poverty. This
underscores our commitment to ensure that public resources are used
effectively on poverty reducing expenditures to the benefit of the poor.
Already there is a framework in place to monitor and track these resources
as part of the agreement with the Bretton Woods Institutions in our
PRGF program.
-end.
I.
INTRODUCTION
II. THE WORLD ECONOMY
III. THE DOMESTIC ECONOMY
IV. CO-OPERATION AND INTEGRATION
V. OUTTURN OF THE 2001 BUDGET
VI. POVERTY ALLEVIATION AND THE SOCIAL SECTOR STRATEGY
VII. POVERTY REDUCTION THROUGH INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY
VIII. POVERTY REDUCTION THROUGH INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPEMENT
IX. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
X. GOVERNANCE ISSUES
XI. NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (NGOs)
XII. PUBLIC ENTERPRISES (PEs)
XIII. FISCAL PROJECTION FOR 2002
XIV. CONCLUSION
APPENDIX
|